Tuesday, June 28, 2011

The North Carolina Budget: Controlling the Growth of Government


The North Carolina Legislature recently passed this year’s budget.  They had to override the threatened veto of Governor   Beverly Perdue, and they did it by convincing four Democratic Senators  to vote with the Republicans. It was a victory for taxpayers, and a victory for our American system of government.



Not all will agree with my musings on this issue, but self reflection is useful, so scrutinizing these legislative actions will have value for all of us—agree or not.


Our country has been in a serious economic decline for over two years, and we currently find about 2 million of our citizens unemployed and unable to find work. Any action by our government must be focused on alleviating this catastrophe. The North Carolina legislature has moved to decrease this pain by its actions.

Governments have a tendency to increase in size and scope as time passes. Beginning as a country of 13 million persons in the early nineteenth century, we have reached a population of over 300 million. This increase in our population does not explain, by a long shot, the increase in influence, scope and control of our Government.

As a small example of this

continued “fattening” of government, who has not watched a street repair in their local community, and noted the abundance of workers (cousins, special friends, and relatives) “needed” to patch a divot in our well-used streets. Do we need all those people to fix a one-foot hole in the asphalt? Spending “other people’s money” is easy, especially when there is little public scrutiny. Our Governments—Federal, State, and local—have become bloated at multiple levels, as we citizens have tried to financially support them. I have worried that our Government has become a government of itself, by itself, and for itself because we have not watched closely enough.

This recently became evident in Bell, California when the citizens discovered the enormous salaries and benefits of their elected officials. Subsequently, these officials were removed from office and some face serious criminal charges. If one would take the time to closely investigate the details of hiring, salaries, and benefits of their local government officials, I believe the tendency to incrementally increase all these factors would become evident.

It is too easy to spend our money, and governments must have controls over this weakness. That control, unfortunately, is supposed to come from the people, but frequently, the people are too busy trying to earn enough money to pay their taxes to scrutinize the spending of their government.

It is clear, that Government has become the distributor of resources (money) between different factions. Giving to one group insures their support at the poles, so the “giving” itself has a fundamental conflict of interest. Witness the current federal administration and the favorable treatment of organized labor. This kind of behavior does not benefit the national interest. South Carolina is fighting for over 8,000 jobs while the National Labor Relations Board tries to force Boeing to hire union workers there before they can open their new aircraft plant. It’s clear, in this example,  whose hand is in whose pocket.

The “change” in our recent elected State government in North Carolina is an example of an effective and appropriate public response to the profligate spending of our elected officials. How many new bureaus, with multiple employees, have been created over the years? Does government ever, EVER get smaller? No, it will not, and it will not unless the people force this change.

I have hoped that this economic downturn would be an “opportunity” to decrease the size of government, and our North Carolina Legislature has accomplished that. Thank God.

The most welcomed relief was rolling back the “temporary” increase in the sales tax from 7 3/4%.  Our Governor, threatened   veto of this and other changes, but was fortunately overruled even by members of her own party.

If citizens can change their spending habits during times of financial stress governments must also. Now is the time to accomplish this goal. These changes will make North Carolina a better place for all of us to live, not just the Government. Checking Government growth is healthy for North Carolina’s financial growth. We should all remember this at the next election.

1 comment:

  1. Government is not the most efficient way to get things done, but I think it is dangerous to extrapolate from that to the conclusion that government is always bad. There are some functions that only a government can do. Also, it is important to examine each question from all sides. I have thought about your WSJ article, and your surprise at the size of the patient's bill. But did you stop to think about who was the recipient of some of that money...the doctors that treated him!! Doctors, insulated from the business side of their practices, may not realize how dependent they are on government "handouts." Beware of the ideology that prevents you from knowing and acknowledging the facts!

    ReplyDelete